Paper Camp

medicate ADDICTION AS A PROBLEM-DETERMINED governing body A CASE STUDY entrance medicate dependence faces to be a rapidly growing societal line that leaves many lives destroyed in its wake. Families ar ripped a initiate by its devastating restore, and myriad dose addicts be unable to sluttish themselves from the powerful grip of dose dependance and consequently pay with their lives. According to Edmonds and Wilcocks (1995), do do drugss dependency is a very realistic line of pull in in South Africa. It affects mountain from apiece(prenominal) walks of life and depose no longer be considered a localize problem.Jackson, Usher and OBrien (2006) found that the be intimate of having a family member that is addicted to drugs, curiously a child, had a unsounded strength on other members of the speedy family as well as on the family social intercourseships. pantryman and Bauld (2005) highlighted the devastation p atomic number 18nts go through with(predicate) in larn that their child was addicted to drugs and the subsequent impact that this had on their lives. Grohsman (2007) argues that the impact of drug dependance goes beyond the individual and the family, as the ripples in that respectfrom can also be tangle in the larger union and economy.Therefore, it regainms that parents, families, t to each oneers, community and church leaders, healthcare professionals, law en lungement agencies, brass and society at large, have a tremendous task ahead in the prevention and treatment of drug smear throughout the country. Just like a tree bears fruit when conditions are best for such an occurrence to take place, the problem of drug dependency is also simulated to develop within the mise en scene of a constitution of relatedness that put forth on the nose the right ingredients for its emergence.Therefore, as the 3 inquiry worker, I set out to explore the peculiar(a)(prenominal) interactions betwixt role players that created a suited environment for the problem of drug colony to emerge. As human beings, we are societal creatures and thus our life experiences are necessarily tied up in the experiences of others. whatsoever attempt to understand a bug outicular individual has to include those that form part of that individuals ecology of living Statement of the problem ? Drop in attendance and performance at work or school. Engaging in unaired or suspicious behaviors. ? fast reposition in friends, favorite hangouts, and hobbies. ? Unexplained change over in personalizedity or attitude. ? Sudden mood swings, irritability, or angry outbursts. ? Periods of curious hyperactivity, agitation, or giddiness. ? To built up a drug tolerance ? take drugs to keep off or relieve withdrawal symptoms. ? anomic control over your drug practice ? life revolves more or less drug procedure ? aband bingled activities you using upd to enjoy,. continue to use drugs, despite learned its hurting you. Signifi cance of the show The purpose of this theater was to gain a better judgment of how a problemdetermined system authentic around a case of drug addiction within the context of a system of relatedness. The epistemological framework informing this soft do primary(prenominal) was constructivism. The six instrumentalists who took part in the chew over represent the most outstanding role players in the particular context of living.The individual battling with drug addiction, his parents, older sister, matriarchal grandmother and maternal aunt were interviewed. The methods of info collection employed were semi-structured interviews, a chronological event chart, genograms, and an eco-map. The interviews were interpreted using the hermeneutic approach. The different themes that emerged from each musicians story were integrated in relation to each other and with respect to the collaborative sources of entropy.The most dominant themes extracted within this get hold of are the init ial reactions to Andrews drug addiction, life changes experienced due to Andrews drug addiction, support, as well as the piths attributed to Andrews drug addiction. Further researcher into problem-determined systems in different cultures is recommended. To Students Firstly, the one causality of drug abuse among university students is accomplice pressure, peculiarly from the social influences among friends, school, and the community.If their social main conclave is using drugs, it can risk for teens because they are the juncture age that re ally short to be persuaded. For example, most of university students got a slew of money from their parents and a lot of students left-hand(a) home and have a immunity to stay in dormitory by themselves, these can cause teenagers to try drugs undecomposed to fit in the social norms, they exponent do it to impress their buddies to be considered nerveless as part of being in the group and gain acceptance by friends.To Everybodyas we st raight off, today this entire round called drug, affect mostly young hoi polloi and it is more obvious in places where on that point are many gathered, like university because of the readiness of finding drugs in university, whenever they want, it is really slatternly for them to buy it because of weak lawenforcement in our country. In short, University students use drug because peer pressure, faulty function of the family, to relive their belief and theweak lawenforcement. I depend it is a big problem so oft and we should do anything to protect them from drug.They acquire to be more educated around drug abuse and have a stopping drug campaign. Moreover, the most strategic that can help is a family. truehearted family relationship, interest in your teens, talking with reasons can prevent drug use Limitations of the choose Throughout the entire process of end this necessitate, the following limitations were found The focus of this canvass was just now directed on the experiences of one particular family in one limited culture. This narrow scope might be considered a limitation to this study, as it only explored how a single Caucasian family ascribed sum to their particular experience of rug addiction. However, the main reasoning or driving force of this study was non to generalise the experiences of a particular family as being mistakable or dissimilar to the experiences of other families. Therefore, the soft orientation of this study allowed me as the researcher to focus my attention bushelly on the manner in which one family conceptualised their experiences of drug addiction. As was pointed out, Terre Blanche et al. (2006) explain that a soft approach allows the researcher to study selected issues in depth, openness and etail as it involves the studying of real-life situations as they unfold naturally. Therefore, the focus of this study was not aimed at aspects of generalised applicability that would ruin within the domain of quantita tive research. some other limitation to this study was the absence of Tims perspective regarding the family drama. However, it was each actors privilege and right to decide whether they treasured to partake in this research study. Tims refusal to be a part of this research study was therefore respected. Review or related determine Personal floor and backgroundChildhood memory pic In response to the news of Andrews drug addiction, David and Lauren both beatified themselves and essay to make find of the situation. twain Emma and Sophia authorship that they also blamed David and Lauren for Andrews drug problem. When Katie heard about Andrews drug addiction, she blamed him for it, while Andrew also describe that he only had himself to blame. The archetypal theme contains all the initial reactions experienced by the participants shortly after Andrews drug problem was exposed. Moreover, Andrews reaction to the responses from is family is also included here. Early adolescence L auren, David, Katie, Emma and Sophia all account experiencing shock. Both Lauren and David report experiencing devastation, impuissance and guilt. Yet Lauren and David also mat up protruding as they describe how the puzzle pieces discharge into place at that moment. Emma was the only participant to report feelings of utter disbelief, and Katie was the only participant who reported that she was not surprised by the news of Andrews drug addiction as she had all along been suspecting that something was do by with Andrew.Andrew reported feeling embarrassed and dreary when he told his family about his drug problem. tour point Theme Two support Changes Experienced due to Andrews Drug Addiction This theme characterises all the changes that ended in the family from the impact of Andrews drug addiction. likewise included in this theme are the changes that took place in Andrews stimulate life as a result of his drug addiction. Emotional changes Lauren and David reported that they felt up helpless, guilty and overwhelmed by Andrews drug addiction. Emma and Sophia reported that they felt overwhelmed by the intent of their involvement.Both Lauren and Andrew reported that they both felt abruptly alone during this period. 15 Katie was the only participant to report that she felt tied-d possess by her responsibilities toward her own family, and that she was subsequently rather uninvolved in Andrews problems. Andrew reported that he felt anger towards his family. Identity changes Lauren, David and Andrew reported that they vox populi of themselves as failures. Lauren felt that she had failed as a mother and David felt that he failed as a father. Andrew reported that he was tagged as the black sheep of the family when his drug addiction became public.David was the only participant to report that he was embarrassed by Andrew. Occupational changes Lauren reported that her occupational situation had become nerve-wracking as she repeatedly had to take time off fr om work as a result of Andrews drug addiction. She frequently had to attend court hearings when he had been arrested. Andrew reported that he had lost his job as a result of his drug addiction. descent changes Lauren, David, Katie and Andrew all reported that there was lots more conflict between the family members. David and Lauren reported that communication within the family had become constrained.Emma and Sophia reported that they became much closer to the members of the Joubert family as a result of their involvement. Katie was the only participant to report that she visited her parents less because Andrew was there. Reinforcement The orientation of this study is also adequately disclosed in that, as the researcher, I clearly demarcated my personal interest in the study and expectations thereof. The nature of the study was also clearly explained. As the researcher, my engagement with the material is reflected through the hermeneutic process of data analysis, which attempts to discover meaning and to achieve understanding.Consequently, specific themes were identified that seem to underlie each participants unique experience regarding the topic of the study. Therefore, I attempted to approach this 26 study from a position of not knowing and allowed myself the privilege of seeing the world through the eyes of each participant that took part in this study. The hermeneutic process of data analysis also allowed me the opportunity to firm ground the various interpretations, by linking each identified theme with examples from the specific interviews conducted with the participants.The inclemency of this study was obtained by utilising the triangulation strategy. The data generated in this study was obtained from multiple sources such as the books study, the description of the family and its members, the genograms, a chronological event chart, an eco-map and semi-structured interviews. The validity of this study is notwithstanding strengthened by the overall tackiness reflected in the qualitative nature, postmodern ontology, constructivist epistemology, literature study, hermeneutic method of analysis and collaborative resources chosen for this study.As such, a visible take out of relevance runs through the different facets of this study. The study also appears fruitful as it provides an copiousness of rich and meaningful descriptions about drug addiction as a problem-determined system. In particular, the participants that took part in this study all agreed that the ways in which I engaged them individually had make sniff out to them. As such, catalytic validity has been achieved. goal This study allowed me as the researcher the profound privilege of bearing witness to abstruse complexities of the Joubert family drama.Through the stories told by each participant, the themes that seem to underlie them, and from the collaborative sources of data, I was able to see how Andrews drug addiction developed within the context of his famil y system. The following hypotheses were made It appears that the Joubert family has always had extremely limiting rules to which each member had to adhere. These rules inevitably resulted in the brass of redundant 28 patterns of interaction between the family members.The limited family repertoire provided a sense of stability as it ensured the predictability of each family member. mayhap Andrews birth marked the father of this familys evolution from an undifferentiated change surface of sameness to greater individual differentiation. When Andrew was much younger, it was easier for the family to maintain its stability or consideration quo by opposing the difference or the new information that Andrew tried to exercise to the family system. At this time, Andrew was merely pushed toward the periphery of the family as he was labelled the black sheep and the outsider.Thus, by reframing the difference that Andrew brought to his family as deviance, the family was able to tarry homeos tatic and unchanged. But despite the Joubert familys commitment to sameness, they had managed to create the context for change. Their immediate response to the challenge that Andrews drug addiction posed to their stability, was to form a problem-determined system whereby they all agreed through their languaging that Andrews drug addiction was in fact a problem. In this manner, the family tried to keep Andrew as their scapegoat by once again labelling him as the sole carrier of the problem.However, Andrews drug addiction was much stronger than the homeostatic tendency of the Joubert family unit, and so evolution could take place. As a result, the stable family system was pushed off its axes and relationships were modify to such an extent that greater differentiation amongst the family members was made possible. Finally, it seems appropriate to say that where there was a beginning there is now an ending and in that way the study has come full circle as it achieved that which it has s et out to achieve.